Paper Vs Screen

Today, students have access to a number of studying aids from print options to screen selections. Each student is unique and so are their studying habits. Which students are reading paper vs. computer screen? Why?

 'Digital Eye Strain' symptoms fall into two main categories: those linked to accommodative or binocular vision stress, and external symptoms linked to dry eye. Although symptoms are typically transient, they may be frequent and persistent, and have an economic impact .

To escape from 'Digital Eye Strain', the educators often advise students to try varied studying strategies to find their studying preferences. Digital eye strain (DES), also known as computer vision syndrome, encompasses a range of ocular and visual symptoms, and estimates suggest its prevalence may be 50% or more among computer users.

PRINT VS. DIGITAL SCREEN READING HABITS

A 2019 analysis by a University of North Dakota professor found that students of all ages absorb more information when they’re reading directly on paper. An international analysis also concluded that paper beat screens by over a fifth of a standard deviation. What does this mean exactly? Reading from paper can help students recall information much more easily and retain it for longer periods. Read on to learn more about reading paper vs. computer screen.

BENEFITS OF USING PAPER FOR STUDYING INSTEAD OF SCREENS

There are certainly similarities between reading paper vs. computer screen. However, there are also significant differences. Print books have seen a resurgence in popularity among students of all ages. Here are a few reasons why reading printed information is more beneficial:

1. Absorb and Recall More Information Anyone who reads from print books instead of screen technology absorbs more information. An Ackerman and Goldsmith (2011) study found that participants who study digitally dedicated less time and had lower comprehension scores. Print books allow students to mark the progress they’ve made and go back to confirm that information. Being able to highlight, underline and bookmark valuable information keeps a student’s performance much more consistent.
2. Much Easier on the Eyes. It’s no secret that digital screens take a toll on the eyes! In fact, too much screen time can impact a student negatively. Using digital technology to complete homework or study can act as a distraction. The internet offers too many distractions that can hinder a student’s studying. Reading via a screen makes the eyes work much harder than reading a print book. Studies have shown that people tend to blink far less when reading on a screen. This can cause the eyes to dry out and become sore. This strain can become irritating and impact a student’s performance.
3. Less Likely to Get Distracted. Students who read e-books over print books have a tendency to become distracted more easily. This is not just because of easy access to the internet. Digital readers dedicate more time to scanning keywords which breaks up their reading. E-books with multimedia experiences can be especially distracting. Although the books may engage the reader temporarily, readers remembered fewer narrative points in the end than print readers. E-readers are not always able to recall the information they consumed. They may also have lower reading comprehension.
4. Enhance the Joy of Reading. Textbooks allow students to experience the authentic pleasure of reading. Print book sales are on the rise for a number of reasons. Not only do they offer a traditional form of reading, print books also last for a long period of time. Books a student can hold and shift through can inspire them and prevent distractions. They also allow a student to have more autonomy. This is because students can jot down notes, highlight key pieces of information and refer back. This sets a good example for kids!

MAKE THE SWITCH FROM SCREEN TO PAPER READING

Whether your child prefers e-books or print books, remember that the experience of reading can enrich their life. Although e-books have become easily accessible and immersive, print books offer children a more authentic, healthy learning experience. Encourage your child to make the switch from e-books to print books to enhance their reading performance.

References,

1. Sheppard AL, Wolffsohn JS. Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement and amelioration. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 16;3(1):e000146. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000146. PMID: 29963645; PMCID: PMC6020759.
2. Dain SJ, McCARTHY AK, Chan-Ling T. Symptoms in VDU Operators. Optometry and Vision Science 1988;65:162–7. doi:10.1097/00006324-198803000-00004 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Costanza MA. Visual and ocular symptoms related to the use of video display terminals. J Behav Optom 1994;5:31–6. [Google Scholar]
4. Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome (A.K.A. digital eye strain). Optometry in Practice 2016;17:1–10. [Google Scholar]
5. Daum KM, Clore KA, Simms SS, et al.. Productivity associated with visual status of computer users. Optometry 2004;75:33–47. doi:10.1016/S1529-1839(04)70009-3 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. eMarketer. Digital set to take majority share in UK time spent with media in 2016. 2016. https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Digital-Set-Take-Majority-Share-UK-Time-Spent-with-Media-2016/1013039 (accessed 10 Mar 2017).
7. Palaiologou I. Children under five and digital technologies: implications for early years pedagogy. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 2016;24:5–24. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2014.929876 [Google Scholar]
8. eMarketer. Mobile takes majority share of UK time with digital media. 2016. https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Mobile-Takes-Majority-Share-of-UK-Time-with-Digital-Media/1014676 (accessed 10 Aug 2017).
9. The Vision Council. Eyes overexposed: The digital device dilemma: digital eye strain report. 2016. https://www.thevisioncouncil.org/content/digital-eye-strain (accessed 10 Mar 2018).
10. Office for National Statistics. Internet users in the UK 2017.  https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/itandinternetindustry/bulletins/internetusers/2017#quality-and-methodology (accessed 8 Mar 2018).
11. American Optometric Association. Computer vision syndrome. 2017. https://www.aoa.org/patients-and-public/caring-for-your-vision/protecting-your-vision/computer-vision-syndrome?sso=y (accessed 8 Mar 2018).
12. Sheedy JE, Hayes JN, Engle J. Is all asthenopia the same? Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:732–9. doi:10.1097/00006324-200311000-00008 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Portello JK, Rosenfield M, Bababekova Y, et al.. Computer-related visual symptoms in office workers. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2012;32:375–82. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00925.x [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Guillon M, Maïssa C. Tear film evaporation--effect of age and gender. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010;33:171–5. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2010.03.002 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Courtin R, Pereira B, Naughton G, et al.. Prevalence of dry eye disease in visual display terminal workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009675 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009675 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Tauste A, Ronda E, Molina M-J, et al.. Effect of contact lens use on computer vision syndrome. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2016;36:112–9. doi:10.1111/opo.12275 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Subcommittee E. The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the epidemiology subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop. Ocular Surface 2007;5:93–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, et al.. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf 2017;15:539–74. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Moon JH, Lee MY, Moon NJ. Association between video display terminal use and dry eye disease in school children. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus 2014;51:87–92. doi:10.3928/01913913-20140128-01 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Moon JH, Kim KW, Moon NJ. Smartphone use is a risk factor for pediatric dry eye disease according to region and age: a case control study. BMC Ophthalmol 2016;16:188 doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0364-4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Vilela MAP, Pellanda LC, Fassa AG, et al.. Prevalence of asthenopia in children: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Pediatr 2015;91:320–5. doi:10.1016/j.jped.2014.10.008 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]